Marketing Authorization of Pharmaceutical Products with Special Reference to Multisource (Generic) Products: A Manual for Drug Regulatory Authorities - Regulatory Support Series No. 005
(1998; 213 pages)
Table of Contents
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentI. INTRODUCTION
Close this folderII. PROVISIONS AND PREREQUISITES FOR REGULATORY CONTROL
View the documentA. Political will and commitment
View the documentB. Legislation
View the documentC. Accountability
View the documentD. Resources for the marketing authorization function
View the documentE. Fees and cost recovery
View the documentF. Inventory of existing products on the market
View the documentG. Rational selection of products
View the documentH. Special access schemes
View the documentI. Postmarketing activities
Open this folder and view contentsIII. OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Open this folder and view contentsIV. REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
View the documentV. ISSUE OF WRITTEN MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentVI. VARIATIONS
View the documentVII. PERIODIC REVIEWS
View the documentVIII. SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentGLOSSARY
View the documentABBREVIATIONS
View the documentREFERENCES
Open this folder and view contentsANNEXES
 

F. Inventory of existing products on the market

Important as it is to evaluate new products prior to marketing, the marketing authorization process and control of quality, safety and efficacy are compromised if the DRA cannot identify products that are already being marketed without prior approval. It would be inequitable for applicants that have generated scientific documentation and submitted their products to the authorization process to be penalized by delays in reaching the market, expenditure of resources and payment of any fee that is in place, as compared with manufacturers who have not sought premarket approval.

The market inventory needs to be conducted only once, shortly after the marketing authorization system is established. It is normal to issue a provisional marketing authorization at this point, and to conduct a review (or screening) of provisionally authorized products as soon as possible. All manufacturers and importing agencies must be given reasonable notice through official publications (e.g. gazettes), the trade press and other media of their obligation to notify the authority by a specific date of all medicinal products that they currently distribute within the jurisdiction of the authority and that they intend to continue to supply after a duly appointed date on which licensing requirements become effective (1; see also Annex 1).

Once completed, the inventory consists of a printed text and/or electronic database. The information it should contain and the subsequent review of provisionally authorized products are discussed in Annex 1. Essentially the data set comprises pharmaceutical, clinical and administrative information about the product. The model system for computer-assisted drug registration (2 and 3) includes provision for an inventory.

Knowledge of what is already on the market has a number of benefits for public health, including:

• The ability to produce a list of products manufactured at a site found to be unsuitable by GMP inspectors;

• Ready access to a list of products containing a particular substance(s) when a hazard from that substance(s) has been detected;

• Knowledge of competing products for pricing purposes.

It is a major task to build a complete inventory of a hitherto unregulated market and most countries undertake it in stages. It should be undertaken in parallel with the introduction of premarket evaluations and authorizations; a short delay in commencing the inventory quickly becomes a long delay.

Among the first steps in conducting an inventory is to obtain an estimate of the number of products that may require provisional marketing authorization. It can be difficult to arrive at even a reasonably accurate figure, and the total may be dauntingly large. Experience has shown, however, that with each step taken by the DRA in conducting the inventory and accumulating data for the subsequent review, significant numbers of products are voluntarily withdrawn (4). These are likely to be products of marginal viability which do not warrant expending company resources on preparation of the necessary documentation and generation of data on, for example, stability. Some of the products may not even be marketed, but have simply been kept on file as an option for the future.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013