Marketing Authorization of Pharmaceutical Products with Special Reference to Multisource (Generic) Products: A Manual for Drug Regulatory Authorities - Regulatory Support Series No. 005
(1998; 213 pages)
Table of Contents
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentI. INTRODUCTION
Open this folder and view contentsII. PROVISIONS AND PREREQUISITES FOR REGULATORY CONTROL
Open this folder and view contentsIII. OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Open this folder and view contentsIV. REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
View the documentV. ISSUE OF WRITTEN MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentVI. VARIATIONS
View the documentVII. PERIODIC REVIEWS
View the documentVIII. SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentGLOSSARY
View the documentABBREVIATIONS
View the documentREFERENCES
Close this folderANNEXES
Open this folder and view contentsAnnex 1: National drug regulatory legislation: guiding principles for small drug regulatory authorities1
Open this folder and view contentsAnnex 2: *Guidelines for Implementation of the WHO Certification Scheme on the Quality of Pharmaceutical Products Moving in International Commerce1
Close this folderAnnex 3: *Multisource (Generic) Pharmaceutical Products: Guidelines on Registration Requirements to Establish Interchangeability1
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentGlossary
Open this folder and view contentsPart One. Regulatory assessment of interchangeable multisource Pharmaceutical products
Open this folder and view contentsPart Two. Equivalence studies needed for marketing authorization
Open this folder and view contentsPart Three. Tests for equivalence
View the documentPart Four. In vitro dissolution tests in product development and quality control
View the documentPart Five. Clinically important variations in bioavailability leading to non-approval of the product
View the documentPart Six. Studies needed to support new post-marketing manufacturing conditions
View the documentPart Seven. Choice of reference product
View the documentAuthors
View the documentReferences
View the documentAppendix 1. Examples of national requirements for in vivo equivalence studies for drugs included in the WHO Model List of Essential Drugs (Canada, Germany and the USA, August 1994)
View the documentAppendix 2. Explanation of symbols used in the design of bioequivalence studies in humans, and commonly used pharmacokinetic abbreviations
View the documentAppendix 3. Technical aspects of bioequivalence statistics
View the documentAnnex 4: Model Guidelines on Conflict of Interest and Model Proforma for a Signed Statement on Conflict of Interest
View the documentAnnex 5: Model Contract between a Regulatory Authority and an External Evaluator of Chemistry, Pharmaceutical and Bioavailability Data
View the documentAnnex 6: Model Application Form for new Marketing Authorizations, Periodic Reviews and Variations, with Notes to the Applicant
View the documentAnnex 7: Detailed Advice on Evaluation of Data by the Drug Regulatory Authority
Open this folder and view contentsAnnex 8: Ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion1
View the documentAnnex 9: Model marketing authorization letter
View the documentAnnex 10: Model List of Variations (Changes) to Pharmaceutical Aspects of Registered Products which may be made without Prior Approval
Open this folder and view contentsAnnex 11: *Guidelines for stability testing of pharmaceutical products containing well established drug substances in conventional dosage forms1
 

Part Four. In vitro dissolution tests in product development and quality control

In vitro dissolution tests are valuable in product development and to monitor batch to batch consistency of the manufacturing process following approval to market. In vitro dissolution test results are also used to test release characteristics of a dosage form in storage, i.e., to measure stability of the release rate. Dissolution testing may be considered as a useful check for several characteristics of the dosage form, to include:

- particle size distribution, state of hydration, crystal form and other solid state properties of the active ingredients;

- mechanical properties of the form itself (water content, resistance to crushing force for tablets, integrity of the shell for capsules and coated tablets, etc.).

When used in product quality control, information about in vitro dissolution should be provided in the documentation for marketing authorization. In vitro dissolution tests and specifications for quality control should be based either on suitable compendial specifications or on the in vitro performance of the test batches used to generate material for the equivalence study. Where sufficient full-scale process validation batches are not prepared in the immediate post-approval period, several batches (two or three are recommended) of the test product should be manufactured in the pre-approval period according to standard, consistent, well-documented procedures. Two of these batches should contain at least 100,000 units or 10% of the intended production batch, whichever is larger. The third, if prepared, may be smaller (e.g., 25,000 units). Justification should be provided if smaller batches are used. Material from these test batches is used both to provide material for dissolution studies and also for equivalence testing. Dissolution tests on these batches should be based on physiologically relevant media and test conditions. When deciding upon the test methods to be used, it is recommended to start experiments with widely-used compendial methods “paddle” and “basket”, and try other methods (“flow through cell” etc.) when these fail to demonstrate sufficient discriminatory power. Dissolution profiles are recommended, even when a single point compendial dissolution test is available. In case of immediate release pharmaceutical products a single point dissolution may be used for quality control purposes. Specifications of the dissolution performance of subsequently manufactured batches will be based on the results of the dissolution tests performed on the test batches. Whereas it is undisputed that the value of dissolution testing will be enhanced if the dissolution results can be shown to reflect important changes in formulation and/or the manufacturing process by in vivo studies the practicalities are still under discussion. It is not recommended to broaden the dissolution specification based on the performance of the test batches beyond the point where equivalence between the test material used in the equivalence study and subsequently manufactured production batches can no longer be assumed.

The following data should be recorded and included in the documentation for marketing authorization:

(a) Comparative dissolution results for test and reference pharmaceutical products after intervals appropriate for products and conditions under investigation (normally a minimum three sampling times).

(b) For each sampling time, the observed data, individual values, the range and the coefficient of variation (relative standard deviation) should be reported.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013