Marketing Authorization of Pharmaceutical Products with Special Reference to Multisource (Generic) Products: A Manual for Drug Regulatory Authorities - Regulatory Support Series No. 005
(1998; 213 pages)
Table of Contents
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentI. INTRODUCTION
Open this folder and view contentsII. PROVISIONS AND PREREQUISITES FOR REGULATORY CONTROL
Open this folder and view contentsIII. OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Open this folder and view contentsIV. REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
View the documentV. ISSUE OF WRITTEN MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentVI. VARIATIONS
View the documentVII. PERIODIC REVIEWS
View the documentVIII. SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF MARKETING AUTHORIZATION
View the documentGLOSSARY
View the documentABBREVIATIONS
View the documentREFERENCES
Close this folderANNEXES
Open this folder and view contentsAnnex 1: National drug regulatory legislation: guiding principles for small drug regulatory authorities1
Open this folder and view contentsAnnex 2: *Guidelines for Implementation of the WHO Certification Scheme on the Quality of Pharmaceutical Products Moving in International Commerce1
Close this folderAnnex 3: *Multisource (Generic) Pharmaceutical Products: Guidelines on Registration Requirements to Establish Interchangeability1
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentGlossary
Open this folder and view contentsPart One. Regulatory assessment of interchangeable multisource Pharmaceutical products
Close this folderPart Two. Equivalence studies needed for marketing authorization
View the document7. Documentation of equivalence for marketing authorization
View the document8. When equivalence studies are not necessary
Close this folder9. When equivalence studies are necessary and types of studies required
View the documentIn vivo studies
View the documentIn vitro studies
Open this folder and view contentsPart Three. Tests for equivalence
View the documentPart Four. In vitro dissolution tests in product development and quality control
View the documentPart Five. Clinically important variations in bioavailability leading to non-approval of the product
View the documentPart Six. Studies needed to support new post-marketing manufacturing conditions
View the documentPart Seven. Choice of reference product
View the documentAuthors
View the documentReferences
View the documentAppendix 1. Examples of national requirements for in vivo equivalence studies for drugs included in the WHO Model List of Essential Drugs (Canada, Germany and the USA, August 1994)
View the documentAppendix 2. Explanation of symbols used in the design of bioequivalence studies in humans, and commonly used pharmacokinetic abbreviations
View the documentAppendix 3. Technical aspects of bioequivalence statistics
View the documentAnnex 4: Model Guidelines on Conflict of Interest and Model Proforma for a Signed Statement on Conflict of Interest
View the documentAnnex 5: Model Contract between a Regulatory Authority and an External Evaluator of Chemistry, Pharmaceutical and Bioavailability Data
View the documentAnnex 6: Model Application Form for new Marketing Authorizations, Periodic Reviews and Variations, with Notes to the Applicant
View the documentAnnex 7: Detailed Advice on Evaluation of Data by the Drug Regulatory Authority
Open this folder and view contentsAnnex 8: Ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion1
View the documentAnnex 9: Model marketing authorization letter
View the documentAnnex 10: Model List of Variations (Changes) to Pharmaceutical Aspects of Registered Products which may be made without Prior Approval
Open this folder and view contentsAnnex 11: *Guidelines for stability testing of pharmaceutical products containing well established drug substances in conventional dosage forms1
 
In vivo studies

For certain drugs and dosage forms, in vivo documentation of equivalence, through either a bioequivalence study, a comparative clinical pharmacodynamic study, or a comparative clinical trial, is regarded as especially important. Examples are listed below.

(a) Oral immediate release pharmaceutical products with systemic action when one or more of the following criteria apply:

(i) indicated for serious conditions requiring assured therapeutic response;

(ii) narrow therapeutic window/safety margin; steep dose-response curve;

(iii) pharmacokinetics complicated by variable or incomplete absorption or absorption window, nonlinear pharmacokinetics, presystemic elimination/high first-pass metabolism >70%;

(iv) unfavourable physicochemical properties, e.g., low solubility, instability, metastable modifications, poor permeability, etc.;

(v) documented evidence for bioavailability problems related to the drug or drugs of similar chemical structure or formulations;

(vi) where a high ratio of excipients to active ingredients exists.

(b) Non-oral and non-parenteral pharmaceutical products designed to act by systemic absorption (such as transdermal patches, suppositories, etc.).

(c) Sustained or otherwise modified release pharmaceutical products designed to act by systemic absorption.

(d) Fixed combination products (see WHO Technical Report Series No. 825, 1992) with systemic action.

(e) Non-solution pharmaceutical products which are for non-systemic use (oral, nasal, ocular, dermal, rectal, vaginal, etc. application) and are intended to act without systemic absorption. In these cases, the bioequivalence concept is not suitable and comparative clinical or pharmacodynamic studies are required to prove equivalence. This does not, however, exclude the potential need for drug concentration measurements in order to assess unintended partial absorption.

In cases (a) to (d) plasma concentration measurements over time (bioequivalence) are normally sufficient proof for efficacy and safety. In case (e) the bioequivalence concept is not suitable and comparative clinical or pharmacodynamic studies are required to prove equivalence.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013