WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter 1998, No. 09&10
(1998; 23 pages)
Table of Contents
Open this folder and view contentsRegulatory decisions
Close this folderDrug surveillance
View the documentAlbumin and plasma protein fraction - safety concerns: USA
View the documentAlendronic acid - reminder: oesophageal reactions: UK
View the documentDrug-induced amnesia - review: Australia
View the documentIsotretinoin - depression: Australia
View the documentIsotretinoin - adverse reaction profile: UK
View the documentLeukotriene antagonists: montelukast & zafirlukast - safe use: UK
View the documentLevonorgestrel - use for emergency contraception: WHO/HRP
View the documentSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) - haemorrhage: Australia
View the documentSildenafil (Viagra) - summary of reports of death: update: USA
View the documentTryptophan, 5HTP and eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome - impurities confirmed: USA
Open this folder and view contentsNew developments
Open this folder and view contentsMedical devices
Open this folder and view contentsGeneral information
Open this folder and view contentsMedication errors
Open this folder and view contentsVeterinary medicine
 

Levonorgestrel - use for emergency contraception: WHO/HRP

WHO/HRP. Researchers working with the UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training Human Reproduction have confirmed that the use of levonorgestrel alone for emergency contraception is more effective and produces adverse effects in considerably fewer users than the Yuzpe regimen (consisting of combined oral contraceptives containing an estrogen and a progestogen in two doses with an interval of 12 hours).

Levonorgestrel is one of the two active compounds in combined oral contraceptive pills. In the regimen used for emergency contraception, two pills each containing 0.75 mg of levonorgestrel are administered with an interval of 12 hours. Calculations of the number of pregnancies that could have occurred if no treatment had been given showed that levonorgestrel had prevented 85% of unintended pregnancies as compared to 57% with the Yuzpe regimen. The success rate for both treatments is even higher among women who started treatment earlier (within 24 hours) - 95% for levonorgestrel and 77% for the Yuzpe method.

Levonorgestrel was also much better tolerated by the women than the Yuzpe regimen. Adverse reactions were the same for both methods - nausea, vomiting, dizziness, fatigue, headache, breast tenderness and low abdominal pain - but they were reported far less frequently in those taking levonorgestrel. Half the women taking the Yuzpe regimen reported nausea compared to only a quarter of those taking levonorgestrel. Vomiting occurred in 20% of the women taking the Yuzpe regimen, and in only 6% of those taking levonorgestrel.

Reference: Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulaton. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. The Lancet, 8 August 1998.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013