Public Education in Rational Drug Use: A Global Survey - EDM Research Series No. 024
(1997; 106 pages) [Spanish] View the PDF document
Table of Contents
View the documentAcknowledgements
View the documentExecutive summary
Open this folder and view contents1. Introduction
Open this folder and view contents2. Background to the Survey
Open this folder and view contents3. Methodology
Open this folder and view contents4. Findings
Open this folder and view contents5. Discussion
Close this folder6. Conclusions and recommendations
View the document6.1 Funding
View the document6.2 Advocacy
View the document6.3 Training and tools
View the document6.4 Coalitions/partnerships
View the document6.5 Lack of reporting/evaluation/publication
View the document6.6 Organized opposition
View the document6.7 Need for supportive infrastructure
View the document6.8 Summary conclusions
View the documentReferences
Open this folder and view contentsAnnexes
 

6.7 Need for supportive infrastructure

The lack of/need for a supportive infrastructure was cited by many respondents and highlights once again that public education cannot exist in a vacuum. The use of drugs by both consumer and health professionals is powerfully influenced by such issues as sources of drug availability and financing, prescribing behaviour, promotion, legislation and priorities in drug policy. It has been argued that in an unsupportive infrastructure public education may be a waste of time. This view seems unnecessarily defeatist and in the broader sense there are examples of consumer campaigns successfully contributing to infrastructural changes (such as legislation) that open the way to a more supportive environment for other public education activities. Perhaps the potential constraints represented by an unsupportive infrastructure underscore the critical necessity for programme planners to understand and investigate the presence of such constraints during the activity planning process. This highlights again the fact that educational activities do not take place in a vacuum but within a context in which people’s beliefs, practices and structural constraints have to be understood and taken into account.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013