Impact of a Short Course in Pharmacotherapy for Undergraduate Medical Students: An International Multicentre Study - EDM Research Series No. 017
(1995; 23 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
View the documentSummary
View the documentIntroduction
Open this folder and view contentsMaterials and methods
Close this folderResults
View the documentRetention effect
View the documentTransfer effect
View the documentKnowledge on drug treatment of pain
View the documentResults per medical school
View the documentIndependent scoring of results
View the documentQuestionnaire
View the documentDiscussion and conclusion
View the documentAnnex 1: Retention effect
View the documentAnnex 2: Transfer effect
View the documentAnnex 3: Knowledge on treatment of pain
View the documentReferences
View the documentOther documents in the DAP Research Series
View the documentDAP Research Series No. 17
 

Retention effect

The mean scores for each of the six basic steps of the problem solving routine of problem A at T1, T2 and T3 are given in Annex 1a and visualised in Figure 1. At T1 there was no difference between study and control groups for each of the six steps in the problem-solving routine, with a total mean score 6.76 versus 7.14 (maximum score 3 points per step, 18 in total). At T2 the study group showed significantly higher scores than the control group (11.88 vs 7.24). At T3 the study group again scored significantly higher on all steps compared to control students (12.23 vs 7.77), and also when compared to their own previous results at T1.

Results of the matched pair analysis for each of the six steps in problem A are given in Annex 1b, presenting the average increase in student scores in the study group between T1 and T2, and between T1 and T3, when compared with those in the control group.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013