Injection Practices in the Third World: A Case Study in Thailand - EDM Research Series No. 011
(1994; 68 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
View the documentCHAPTER ONE - 1. AIM AND OBJECTIVES
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER TWO - 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER THREE - 3. RESEARCH SETTING
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER FOUR - 4. THERAPY OPTIONS
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER FIVE - 5. RESULTS: THE EXTENT OF INJECTION USE
Close this folderCHAPTER SIX - 6. RESULTS: THE CAUSAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS IN THE POPULARITY OF INJECTIONS
View the document6.1 Concepts relating to the body, disease and discomfort
View the document6.2 Therapeutic expectations and perception of medicines
View the document6.3 Patient-provider exchange and evaluation
View the document6.4 Monetary factors
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER SEVEN - 7. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
View the documentLITERATURE LIST
View the documentOTHER DOCUMENTS IN THE DAP RESEARCH SERIES
View the documentDAP RESEARCH SERIES NO. 11
 

6.3 Patient-provider exchange and evaluation

This last category of cultural factors relates to the therapeutic encounter itself. The patient may be in a state of acute discomfort or pain and he will expect the provider to have an appropriate reaction, most likely an injection. The health care setting may be embarrassing to the patient if there is no privacy or he is ashamed of his condition (as is often the case with venereal diseases). The sex of the provider may also be important. In Ban young men are reluctant to use the health centre because the midwife is a young woman. In general such factors may often lead to a choice of a folk or popular provider although their drugs may not be so effective as those of the professional provider. But if the prime concern of the patient is to conceal his condition or obtain fast treatment, a choice of a folk healer or a popular provider would be more rational. In these settings the client can be fairly sure of convenience, privacy and a drug/drug administration of his choice.

The patient-provider exchange and the subsequent evaluation of the encounter by the patient also depends on the explanatory models of the two parties. These interactions will be discussed in detail in the next chapter. The explanatory model of the patient, although specific to this particular illness episode, is rooted in the medical culture of his therapy management alliance. The rationality of his choices are therefore dependent on cultural as well as individual factors. The provider, on the other hand, is equally influenced by culture although this is primarily the culture of his profession and institutional setting. However, a positive evaluation of the treatment outcome is not necessarily dependent on congruence of the explanatory models of the provider and patient.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013