Injection Practices in the Third World: A Case Study in Thailand - EDM Research Series No. 011
(1994; 68 pages) View the PDF document
Table of Contents
View the documentCHAPTER ONE - 1. AIM AND OBJECTIVES
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER TWO - 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER THREE - 3. RESEARCH SETTING
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER FOUR - 4. THERAPY OPTIONS
Close this folderCHAPTER FIVE - 5. RESULTS: THE EXTENT OF INJECTION USE
View the document5.1 Treatment strategies
View the document5.2 Number of households
View the document5.3 Type of injections
View the document5.4 Children and injections
View the document5.5 Gender and injections
View the document5.6 Injections per treatment provider
View the document5.7 Injections and specific illness conditions
View the document5.8 Number of drugs
View the document5.9 Unknown drugs
View the document5.10 Summary
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER SIX - 6. RESULTS: THE CAUSAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS IN THE POPULARITY OF INJECTIONS
Open this folder and view contentsCHAPTER SEVEN - 7. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
View the documentLITERATURE LIST
View the documentOTHER DOCUMENTS IN THE DAP RESEARCH SERIES
View the documentDAP RESEARCH SERIES NO. 11
 

5.6 Injections per treatment provider

Percent patients who received one or more injections during their first visit to:

Health centre;

25 × 100/60 = 42%

Hospital B.P.:

2 × 100/6 = 33%

+ Other hospitals:

2+0 × 100/6+3 = 22%

++ Hospital U.T.:

2+0+0 × 100/6+3+2= 18%

Private clinics:

15 × 100/19 = 79%

As can be seen from the above table injections are administered most frequently by private medical doctors. The same doctors are working in the hospital in Ban Phang but here it is only 33% of the patients which receive an injection. If one includes the figures from the other public hospitals in the figures from the hospital in Ban Phang, the percentage of patients who receive injections at this level of public health care is as low as 18%. This is a significant difference from the 79% seen in the private sector. The fact that 42% of the patients at the health centre receive an injection is probably due to the social relations between the villagers and the midwife. In addition, the midwives may have been worried that the villagers, if refused an injection, would utilize the services of the informal injection doctor.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013