Medicines and the New Economic Environment
(1998; 252 pages) [Spanish]
Table of Contents
View the documentTHE AUTHORS
View the documentPREFACE
View the documentINTRODUCTION
Close this folderI. THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
Open this folder and view contentsI.1. Opening Speech: Welfare State, Economic Policy and Health Services
Open this folder and view contentsI.2. The Uruguay Round and Drugs
Close this folderI.3. The Normalisation of the International Market for Pharmaceuticals: Future Impacts in Emerging Markets
View the document1. THE GLOBAL CONTEXT
Close this folder2. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NORMS
View the document2.1. The drive towards normalisation
Close this folder2.2. The empirical framework
View the document2.2.1. The current structure of national markets
View the document2.2.2. Patents
View the document2.2.3. Prices
View the document2.2.4. The good manufacturing practices (GMP) and the quality of pharmaceuticals
View the document2.2.5. Generics
View the document2.3. The significance of the empirical information
Open this folder and view contents3. FUTURE TRENDS IN A NORMALISED WORLD
View the document4. THE STEPS TO FOLLOW
View the documentREFERENCES
Open this folder and view contentsII. THE REFORM OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS
Open this folder and view contentsIII. A CHANGING PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Open this folder and view contentsIV. SYNTHESIS AND FORECASTS
View the documentBIBLIOTECA CIVITAS ECONOMÍA Y EMPRESA
View the documentBACK COVER
 
2.2.1. The current structure of national markets

Table 1 summarises recent data on sales and their composition in emerging countries. In a world pharmaceutical market valued at around $120 bn (reckoned at mid 1990s prices and exchange rates), emerging countries account for roughly 20 per cent of the total (China and Korea together make up close on one half of the aggregate). In emerging countries the share of sales captured by foreign firms plus imports, tends to exceed two thirds of the total. The only important countries where this relationship does not hold are China, India, Argentina and Egypt - in each of them, local enterprises have market shares above one half of total sales. Not even in these countries is export of finished products of any consequence (although in certain instances exports of intermediates, or bulk chemicals, is indeed appreciable).

TABLE 1. - Pharmaceutical sales and their distribution by source in emerging countries, 1993/1994 (approximate figures)

Region/country

Sales (US$ bn)

FF Share (%)

Import share (%)

Total number of firms

Number of FF

Latin America

         

Argentina

3.0

47

<1

360

113

Brazil

4.6

70

10

n.a.

n.a.

Colombia

0.9

64

9

200

160

Peru

0.4

62

12

n.a.

n.a.

Mexico

3.6

70

2.5

206

60

Venezuela

0.6

72

n.a.

120

40

Asia

         

China

9.0

n.a.

8

1.450

n.a.

Korea

5.0

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

India

2.0

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Indonesia

0.5

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Malaysia

0.2

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Philippines

0.9

68

<10

251

n.a.

Pakistan

0.7

60

n.a.

263

31

Thailand

0.75

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Vietnam

0.35

50

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Africa

         

Egypt

0.7

25

7

n.a.

n.a.

Morocco

0.4

n.a.

<20

30

n.a.

South Africa

1.0

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

FF: Foreign firms.

For all its simplicity, the table gives a first approximation to what is at stake in the current wave of normalisation. In a number of emerging countries, the foreign firms (almost all are innovative pharmaceutical firms) obtain their sales by means of their local affiliates. But given, as will be shown later, that the advantages of local presence are not so substantial, it would be more convenient if the markets could be supplied through imports (a channel which is still not extensively used). Importation is, however, a safe method only if trade barriers are limited, and if the firm would not thereby run the risk of losing protection for its product; it is there that norms reveal their value. Table 1 also shows that foreign firms do not normally make up a high percentage of the total number of companies manufacturing drugs. That number appears to be quite high. There is little doubt that, in most emerging countries, a pronounced shakedown in the number of producing companies is imminent6. If those two tendencies are taken together, what then will happen to market structure?

6 Among the innovative pharmaceutical firms themselves, the total value of takeovers and mergers in the period from mid 1993 to mid 1995 reached about US$70 bn. Even so, the firm (Glaxo Wellcome) with the largest sales, still does not reach 6 per cent of the world market. Given the need to cut costs, the restructuring offers a route (although not the only one) to avoid parallel outlays on R&D as well as to capture whatever economies of scale there may be. In and of itself, the restructuring of the innovative pharmaceutical firms tends to increase the degree of market concentration in emerging countries. The much more marked impact in the future will come, however, from pressures on local producers.

to previous section to next section
 

Last updated: May 3, 2013